Showing posts with label simu-dating. Show all posts
Showing posts with label simu-dating. Show all posts

Monday, 19 September 2011

Date Deux

Hello dear readers, and thank you for returning to this little puddle of self-indulgence!

I believe I may have made reference to my propensity to simu-date to keep my options open. And maybe the Menfolk can pick up on this, or maybe they're oblivious (Menfolk, can you tell if a girl is simu-dating, and moreover do you mind?)... but while I was emailing ODNU over that cold, November (free) weekend on CatchInfinity I was also emailing DD (Date Deux).

He seemed, well, nice. Normal. Used to be a primary school teacher, now working at a university not too far away.

We arranged a date (after the noncommunicative nonevent that was of course ODNU) and he agreed to roll on down to Surrey, and break some naan bread with me. I did the civilised thing of booking a table in my favourite curry establishment (which he was most amenable to).

I had a whole evening in which to beautify (which to me is picking out the pink dress again and maybe hauling the straighteners through my hair...).

Then I made the fatal mistake of trying to pep myself up with a film. I chose Must Love Dogs -- divorced Diane Lane is set up on dates with a) her father, Christopher Plummer, by accident, then b) fellow dog-lover John Cusack whilst also c) romancing single dad and general dish Dermot Mulroney.

via IMDB
Word to the wise: before a date, don't be tempted to watch "inspirational dating success story" films in which unfeasibly witty and attractive (though slightly more mature) women are faced with the "dilemma" of whether to pick charming boat-builder John Cusack over charismatic divorced dad Dermot Mulroney. Oh boo. Normal chicas like me don't have those sorts of choices and it'll just feed into our insecurities and thwart our expectations even more. D'oh!



...But I would not be thrown off my stride (that much).

So I trundled around to the curry house. I waited a while, read a book (can't remember which, now, but something hugely intellectual, I'm sure... ahem). He turned up. Very tall, very chatty, very charming. We talked (and by we I mean, well, he, and I, in turns, in the manner of Actual Conversation). It was reassuring. We both agreed on the comedy value and quality of that cinematic pinnacle known as Kindergarten Cop. Which is a bonus. We shared dinner (we had to check beforehand that there were no peanuts involved as DD was allergic).


We went on to a pub afterwards, chatted a bit more about his time as a ski instructor. It was all very encouraging. Finally, he went to catch the last train. And he messaged on his way home to say thanks and to reassure me that he had caught the last train. I wrote back to congratulate him on this, and to thank him, too, for a nice evening.

I was very, very encouraged. I thought we'd sparked. We texted a little after that, mostly perfunctories...

...but then...

Radio Silence (from his end, not mine).

Nothing.
Nada.
Nowt.
Zilcharoo.

That was it.

End of. (And I wasn't about to start text-stalking. I don't want to be That Girl Who Won't Go Away, or have the words bunny boiler aligned with my reputation. Perish the thought.)

And I guess so often it just happens like that. I'll never understand why and I could overanalyse it to death but I just thought, OK, stop, breathe, reboot... stay single. Step away from the dating sites. They are no good. No good, I tell thee. And start liking cats because you are fated to end up a mad cat lady.


And so I stepped away from the sites, for quite a few months.

Then came a visit from a friend.


And that Metro article...

Wednesday, 14 September 2011

And Why Not?

So. Hi.

If you found this blog there's a very good chance I begged asked you to follow it. And if you're following it there's a good chance you know me and have already been subjected to one of my anecdotes. Sorry – you get them all over again here. Hence why I've monikered this little hub of self-indulgence Dater Overload. Clever, huh? Punny.

So, why the blog? What's with all the blogging already? 

It occurred to me last Wednesday, as I sat on a train home at about 9pm at night, after a "date" that had kicked off at 7.40pm(ish), and had clearly bypassed success in favour of AWKWARD (I'll explain why in a later post; when it comes to dating, awkward is my default setting.) ...that cometh the hour, cometh the blogging opportunity.


In the last few months since taking a new approach to dating – that is, actually dating rather than complaining about my other default setting: perpetually single I've accumulated a few anecdotes that I felt needed to be shared, and through the medium of blogging. 

And since I haven't kept a diary for longer than five months since about 1998, well, writing to an invisible audience should spur me on, right?


I have to admit, I'm not a serial dater. I'm a simu-dater*, yes, though I like to term my approach prospecting; at best, keeping my options open, or as my friends would so prosaically put it, KISSING A LOT OF FROGS.


via here
...I should state for the record that it helps none that I look nothing like this girl.

Nor am I "kooky" like this girl (just quirky, and that's not the same as kooky, OK?):





…Oh wait. Maybe that's where I'm going wrong. Instead of rocking up to dates in this (minus fairy lights):



I should channel this little fashionista:

via here
Though I'm not sure attire is necessarily the issue.


I digress.


So, I have been Dating (cap. D) on and off since about November, December 2010, with varied results, though the fact I'm still single is testament to (deep breath) how flawed the whole set-up is, how certain sites feed into your insecurities by encouraging, nay, forcing you to create this whole, attractive persona that will drop away the moment you make human contact with that individual who happened to Nudge you... or the affinity tests don't ask the right questions, or the sites play host to people who, let's be honest here, would be better placed defending their honour to 55p women's magazines that shall remain nameless. (And nothing at all to do with my extreme pickiness and exacting standards.)


...Yeah, I think we've hit on the real issue here. I suffer from DATING-RELATED CYNICISM. 

But the moment that I get over the hurdle of believing that I won't meet my lobster through a dating site, that may well be when dating really starts to work for me. 

But only I can come to that conclusion. You can tell me until you're blue in the face that your sister's housemate's cousin's neighbour met her soulmate online but I'll just counter that I'm not your sister's housemate's cousin's neighbour, it hasn't worked for me thus far – and I need to be proven wrong, clearly.


So as I recount my anecdates** I'll also be trying to change my mindset and channel some positive energy into my endeavours.

Wish me luck.


(Please?)

* "Simu-date" -- see Sex and the City, Series 6, Ep1, To Market, To Market when Carrie offsets the pressure of dating Berger for the first time by meeting a different date.

Screengrab from DVD
** Anecdates = anecdotes + dates... See? ...That was my blog name of choice, except someone got there first, blogged for three months then abandoned it. Who would do that? (Um... See my earlier statement on keeping a diary... :-) )

PS Not sure why but my line breaks vary from standard to colossal. One day I'll understand HTML …